« Questioning Unconscious Influences on Decision-Making (in Behavioral and Brain Sciences) | Main | Do we need different types of tenure? On Adam Grant in The New York Times »

January 30, 2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Who are these people who disavow retribution for anyone except bankers? It's not clear if you've got someone in mind, or if that comment was reflexive.

Surely, you don't mean to equate accountability with retribution? Because we can't really even begin to talk about retribution, and whether it is wise or fair, until there is some accountability.

This is what Chris Hayes was getting at here:

"Along with all of the other rising inequalities we've become so familiar with -- in income, in wealth, in access to politicians -- we confront now a fundamental inequality of accountability.

"We can have a just society whose guiding ethos is accountability and punishment, where both black kids dealing weed in Harlem and investment bankers peddling fraudulent securities on Wall Street are forced to pay for their crimes, or we can have a just society whose guiding ethos is forgiveness and second chances, one in which both Wall Street banks and foreclosed households are bailed out, in which both inside traders and street felons are allowed to rejoin polite society with the full privileges of citizenship intact.

"But we cannot have a just society that applies the principle of accountability to the powerless and the principle of forgiveness to the powerful. This is the America in which we currently reside."

Good point, Jonas, thanks. I have two thoughts in response:

1. Honestly, I was thinking of the "hang 'em high" sentiment I pick up so often in connection to the role of financial actors in the downturn, regardless of whether there is any evidence of criminal wrongdoing in any particular case. It's not retributivism proper, but a more base form of vengeance rooted in frustration and anger.

2. I love the Hayes passage, thanks -- right on target. And I agree accountability is prior to retributivism, since the latter assumes proper conviction. In a way, though, accountability is retributivist in the sense that it is backward-looking in directly addressing past wrongs for their own sake (and holding deterrence mainly as a beneficial side-effect). But rather than implicate those who call for accountability as being secretly retributivist, this points out that the backward-looking nature of retributivism that brings forth so much ridicule has merit that often goes unrecognized.

why do the authors (pontrell et al) publish in pay walled journals ? are they not contributing thereby to the status quo, where the wealthy rule ?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

OUR BOOKS
Accepting the Invisible Hand: Market-Based Approaches to Social-Economic Problems, Mark D. White (ed)

Beyond Social Capital: A Critical Approach, Irene van Stavern and Peter Knorringa (eds)

Economics and the Mind, Barbara Montero and Mark D. White (eds)

Ethics and Economics: New Perspectives, Mark D. White and Irene van Staveren (eds)

Ethics in Economics: An Introduction to Moral Frameworks, Jonathan B. Wight

The Feminist Economics of Trade, Irene van Staveren et al (eds)

Handbook of Economics and Ethics, Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren (eds)

The Illusion of Well-Being: Economic Policymaking Based on Respect and Responsiveness, Mark D. White

Kantian Ethics and Economics: Autonomy, Dignity, and Character, Mark D. White

Law and Social Economics: Essays in Ethical Values for Theory, Practice, and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism, Mark D. White

Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

Saving Adam Smith: A Tale of Wealth, Transformation, and Virtue, Jonathan B. Wight

Street Porter and the Philosopher: Conversations on Analytical Egalitarianism, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy (eds)

Teaching the Ethical Foundations of Economics, Jonathan B. Wight and John S. Morton et al

Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Thief of Time: Philosophical Essays on Procrastination, Chrisoula Andreou and Mark D. White (eds)

The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective, Irene van Staveren

The Vanity of the Philosopher: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy