« Harvard Becomes Ugly Censurer | Main | Spiraling Downward »

June 12, 2017

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

A basic income guarantee may possibly be more efficient than, say, SNAP benefits or Section 8 vouchers, which are designed to solve a basic problem: people don't have enough income to survive.

I fail to see what bearing it would have in the health insurance and healthcare markets, where there is an actual market failure due to, among other things, incomplete information and individuals' behavioral biases.

As a thought experiment, try and imagine how a basic income guarantee would solve Akerlof's Market for Lemons problem.

Jonas raises some excellent points. Asking the market to solve problems won't work if the prices and incentives aren't right. And they won't be right in health care when there are huge problems of asymmetric information and negative and positive externalities.

Yes, Obamacare has problems, but many of these arise from trying to ignore the potential market failures outlined above. There were riots in Paris in the 19th century when the government insisted that every house must buy into the sewer system (forcing them to pay for something they didn't want--most people wanted to simply throw their feces into the street as before). Requiring homeowners to connect to the sewer is somewhat akin to forcing citizens to buy into health insurance, for all the negative and positive externalities reasons!

It's the 21st century and a universal basic health system is the way to go. (E.g., Trump recently praised Australia for its health results.) This is not to say that a private system could not exist alongside. Let those who want drink champagne; clean water is good enough for me.
--JW

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

OUR BOOKS
Accepting the Invisible Hand: Market-Based Approaches to Social-Economic Problems, Mark D. White (ed)

Beyond Social Capital: A Critical Approach, Irene van Stavern and Peter Knorringa (eds)

Economics and the Mind, Barbara Montero and Mark D. White (eds)

Ethics and Economics: New Perspectives, Mark D. White and Irene van Staveren (eds)

Ethics in Economics: An Introduction to Moral Frameworks, Jonathan B. Wight

The Feminist Economics of Trade, Irene van Staveren et al (eds)

Handbook of Economics and Ethics, Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren (eds)

The Illusion of Well-Being: Economic Policymaking Based on Respect and Responsiveness, Mark D. White

Kantian Ethics and Economics: Autonomy, Dignity, and Character, Mark D. White

Law and Social Economics: Essays in Ethical Values for Theory, Practice, and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism, Mark D. White

Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

Saving Adam Smith: A Tale of Wealth, Transformation, and Virtue, Jonathan B. Wight

Street Porter and the Philosopher: Conversations on Analytical Egalitarianism, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy (eds)

Teaching the Ethical Foundations of Economics, Jonathan B. Wight and John S. Morton et al

Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Thief of Time: Philosophical Essays on Procrastination, Chrisoula Andreou and Mark D. White (eds)

The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective, Irene van Staveren

The Vanity of the Philosopher: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy