« Call for papers for book: Alternative Perspectives of a Good Society | Main | As if a day weren't short enough as it is... »

March 2, 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I see meteorology, medical science, and economics (or climatology, epidemiology, and macroeconomics more specifically) as much more akin to each other than to physics and chemistry, not only due to the complexity issue you raise, but also because the data they use is largely observational. Even medical RCTs have a lot of uncontrollable elements that have to be isolated using statistical techniques rather than experimental design. I think you could make the case that economics studies the most complex system of the three, but I see it as a difference of degree rather than kind.

I think it's a good point that the "big" questions aren't economic. By "big" questions, of course, we mean questions about the proper goals of policy. Economics provides zero meaningful guidance on what the end goal of any decision maker should be.

It provides a little bit of insight into what those goals generally are (I'm thinking of the Public Choice literature here). But mostly what economics has to offer is optimization; let us know the goal and the sort of resources we have to work with, and we'll figure out the best way to use those resources to advance the goal. But the goal has to come from somewhere more philosophical, whether it be religion, metaphysics, etc.

As for Russ Roberts, the more of him I read the less value I see in it. He brings up important topics, but he seems to have very little respect for those in other fields (such as the philosophers slight), and none at all for those who don't already see things his way. That's no way to learn about the world.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Accepting the Invisible Hand: Market-Based Approaches to Social-Economic Problems, Mark D. White (ed)

Beyond Social Capital: A Critical Approach, Irene van Stavern and Peter Knorringa (eds)

Economics and the Mind, Barbara Montero and Mark D. White (eds)

Ethics and Economics: New Perspectives, Mark D. White and Irene van Staveren (eds)

Ethics in Economics: An Introduction to Moral Frameworks, Jonathan B. Wight

The Feminist Economics of Trade, Irene van Staveren et al (eds)

Handbook of Economics and Ethics, Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren (eds)

The Illusion of Well-Being: Economic Policymaking Based on Respect and Responsiveness, Mark D. White

Kantian Ethics and Economics: Autonomy, Dignity, and Character, Mark D. White

Law and Social Economics: Essays in Ethical Values for Theory, Practice, and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism, Mark D. White

Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

Saving Adam Smith: A Tale of Wealth, Transformation, and Virtue, Jonathan B. Wight

Street Porter and the Philosopher: Conversations on Analytical Egalitarianism, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy (eds)

Teaching the Ethical Foundations of Economics, Jonathan B. Wight and John S. Morton et al

Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Thief of Time: Philosophical Essays on Procrastination, Chrisoula Andreou and Mark D. White (eds)

The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective, Irene van Staveren

The Vanity of the Philosopher: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy