Methodology in Philosophical Bioethics (in the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics)
March 28, 2011
Mark D. White
The latest issue of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (20/2, April 2011) contains two fascinating symposia, the first on methodology in philosophical bioethics and the second on global bioethics. Here are the chapter titles (and links to abstracts and paper)in the first, all of which use Matti Häyry's book Rationality and the Genetic Challenge: Making People Better?
as a starting point for discussion. (I'll post on the global ethics symposium later.)
- Guest Editorial: On Method and Resolution in Philosophical Bioethics, JOHN COGGON
- Classification and Normativity: Some Thoughts on Different Ways of Carving Up the Field of Bioethics, SØREN HOLM
- Vorsprung durch Technik: On Biotechnology, Bioethics, and Its Beneficiaries, NICKY PRIAULX
- Bays, Beaches, and Bioethical Barkings, JAN HELGE SOLBAKK
- Eugenics and the Genetic Challenge, Again: All Dressed Up and Just Everywhere to Go, TOM KOCH
- The Challenge of Nonconfrontational Ethics, JOHN HARRIS
- Confronting Rationality, RONALD M. GREEN
- Nonconfrontational Rationality or Critical Reasoning, VILHJÁLMUR ÁRNASON
- Are All Rational Moralities Equivalent? DARRYL GUNSON
- Genetic Enhancement in Sports: The Role of Reason and Private Rationalities in the Public Arena, SILVIA CAMPORESI and PAOLO MAUGERI
- Reasons, Rationalities, and Procreative Beneficence: Need Häyry Stand Politely By While Savulescu and Herissone-Kelly Disagree? PETER HERISSONE-KELLY
- Balancing Procreative Autonomy and Parental Responsibility, TOM BULLER and STEPHANIE BAUER
Comments