« David Brooks on Daniel Kahneman and the complexities of the mind | Main | The Mysterious William Shakespeare »

October 26, 2011

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This is a very interesting post, Jonathan. I'm going to have look at Wilkinson's TEDTalk. How do you think this squares with some of the data Hans Rosling has put together on Gapminder? Looking at his data (sliced and diced a number of ways), there seems to be a positive correlation between wealth and health. Rosling even has ways to break down the national data and the relationship still seems to hold.

I'm the first to admit that coincidence, correlation and causation are not the same. I would like to know the differences in the data sets. I see lots of wiggle room for both to be correct.

TimS

Hi Tim,

Wilkinson addresses this issue. Having a high average per capita income is not the same thing as having an equal distribution of income. Many high income countries (Norway, Sweden, etc.) have very equal distributions and also high social indicators; the U.S. is an outlier on many substantive measures of welfare (given our high income level we would expect much higher life expectancy, etc.) and we find poorer outcomes.

JW

I loved this book! It's a great contribution to evidence based politics, something we could really use more of (even political philosophers).

(I even wrote a review, It's the Equality, Stupid over on my blog: http://www.philosophersbeard.org/2009/11/its-equality-stupid.html.)

Thanks, Phil, for the link to your interesting blog. For readers: the last parenthesis in Phil's link is not part of the link.

Link fixed, guys.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

OUR BOOKS
Accepting the Invisible Hand: Market-Based Approaches to Social-Economic Problems, Mark D. White (ed)

Beyond Social Capital: A Critical Approach, Irene van Stavern and Peter Knorringa (eds)

Economics and the Mind, Barbara Montero and Mark D. White (eds)

Ethics and Economics: New Perspectives, Mark D. White and Irene van Staveren (eds)

Ethics in Economics: An Introduction to Moral Frameworks, Jonathan B. Wight

The Feminist Economics of Trade, Irene van Staveren et al (eds)

Handbook of Economics and Ethics, Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren (eds)

The Illusion of Well-Being: Economic Policymaking Based on Respect and Responsiveness, Mark D. White

Kantian Ethics and Economics: Autonomy, Dignity, and Character, Mark D. White

Law and Social Economics: Essays in Ethical Values for Theory, Practice, and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism, Mark D. White

Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

Saving Adam Smith: A Tale of Wealth, Transformation, and Virtue, Jonathan B. Wight

Street Porter and the Philosopher: Conversations on Analytical Egalitarianism, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy (eds)

Teaching the Ethical Foundations of Economics, Jonathan B. Wight and John S. Morton et al

Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Thief of Time: Philosophical Essays on Procrastination, Chrisoula Andreou and Mark D. White (eds)

The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective, Irene van Staveren

The Vanity of the Philosopher: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy