« Paternalism and Motivation in the World Cup | Main | Privacy or Lower Premiums? »

June 29, 2014


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jon, thanks for illuminating this issue. You made some keen observations that I had not considered in my post (or in my response in the comments to my critics).

Here's the insight that I find most striking: "The state is giving him the choice of picking his own punishment. "

I have no moral qualms whatsoever about giving Mr. Herald that choice, although I concede you do raise the valid issue of liability -- what happens if something goes wrong with the surgery? I have no ready answer for that question.

"The state is giving him the choice of picking his own punishment."

I also find this a compelling insight. I wonder, though, if it could be taken to an extreme. What if the choice is "permanent physical castration" versus "five years in jail?" In other words, is it still properly called a "choice" if one of the choices is abhorrent?

Yet more: What if both of the choices are abhorrent? "Permanent physical castration" versus "drawn and quartered." Still a "choice?"

Maybe the dual-abhorrent scenario is silly. But in the single-abhorrent scenario, the prisoner is given a choice of a "normal" punishment and an abhorrent one. "OK," one may say, "he can just choose the 'normal' one." What if the prisoner's mother has end-stage cancer? He can go away for five years and likely never see his mother again, or he can simply have a (permanent, maiming) procedure, and spend some more time with mom.

The point of this thought experiment is to illustrate that choice is not an unambiguous good. I think this is a noncontroversial statement in behavioral economics, but, to some people, it isn't.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Accepting the Invisible Hand: Market-Based Approaches to Social-Economic Problems, Mark D. White (ed)

Beyond Social Capital: A Critical Approach, Irene van Stavern and Peter Knorringa (eds)

Economics and the Mind, Barbara Montero and Mark D. White (eds)

Ethics and Economics: New Perspectives, Mark D. White and Irene van Staveren (eds)

Ethics in Economics: An Introduction to Moral Frameworks, Jonathan B. Wight

The Feminist Economics of Trade, Irene van Staveren et al (eds)

Handbook of Economics and Ethics, Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren (eds)

The Illusion of Well-Being: Economic Policymaking Based on Respect and Responsiveness, Mark D. White

Kantian Ethics and Economics: Autonomy, Dignity, and Character, Mark D. White

Law and Social Economics: Essays in Ethical Values for Theory, Practice, and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism, Mark D. White

Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy, Mark D. White (ed.)

Saving Adam Smith: A Tale of Wealth, Transformation, and Virtue, Jonathan B. Wight

Street Porter and the Philosopher: Conversations on Analytical Egalitarianism, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy (eds)

Teaching the Ethical Foundations of Economics, Jonathan B. Wight and John S. Morton et al

Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics, Mark D. White (ed.)

The Thief of Time: Philosophical Essays on Procrastination, Chrisoula Andreou and Mark D. White (eds)

The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective, Irene van Staveren

The Vanity of the Philosopher: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics, Sandra J. Peart and David M. Levy