Enjoy Capitalism
June 26, 2017
By John Morton
As I write this, I’m wearing a t-shirt, a gift from my daughter. It says “Enjoy Capitalism” written in the style of the cursive Coco-Cola logo. Every day I enjoy what’s left of an economic system that is responsible for improving billions of lives around the world. As Milton Friedman put it: “There is no alternative way so far discovered of improving the lot of ordinary people that can hold a candle in the productive activities that are unleashed by a free enterprise system.”
Yet young people are not feeling the joy. Their contempt for capitalism is just behind their contempt for President Trump. Bernie Sanders, a declared Socialist, almost defeated Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries. In Great Britain, voters age 18-34 cast 63 percent of their votes for Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn, who promised to take the country back to the disastrous policies of the 1960s. The Institute of Politics at Harvard released a survey showing more than half of respondents between 18 and 29 do not support capitalism. Young people have legitimate grievances such as low economic growth, high unemployment and underemployment, stagnant wages, and income inequality. The question is whether the rejection of capitalism would make things better or worse.
Capitalism Rocks the World
Using the World Bank’s definition of extreme poverty as living on less than $1.90 a day, since 1990, over one billion people have escaped extreme poverty. In 1990, 35 percent of the world’s population lived in poverty. By 2013, the percentage of the world’s population living in poverty had been cut to 10.7 percent. The reason for this improvement is not foreign aid but a rise in the number of countries embracing capitalism and an expansion of economic freedom. U-2 frontman Bono, a passionate advocate for aid to underdeveloped nations, gets it. He said, “Aid is just a stop-gap. Commerce and entrepreneurial capitalism take more people out of poverty than aid.”
The world is getting more economically free. Two indexes of economic freedom attempt to quantify how capitalistic countries and territories are. The Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World Index measures the degree to which “the policies and institutions of countries are supportive of economic freedom. The cornerstones of economic freedom are personal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to enter markets and compete, and security of the person and privately owned property.” Forty-two data points are used to construct the index. Since 1985, the economic-freedom rating for advanced countries has increased from 6.9 to 7.7. The economic freedom rating for developing countries with ratings since 1985 has increased from 5.0 to 6.7. The world economies are getting freer.
Capitalism Works
Nations that are economically free outperform non-free nations in indicators of well-being.
-
Nations in the top quartile of economic freedom had an average per-capita GDP of $41,228 in 2014, compared to $5,471 for bottom-quartile nations (PPP constant 2011 US$).
-
In the top quartile, the average income of the poorest 10 percent was $11,283, compared to $1,080 in the bottom quartile in 2014 (PPP constant 2011 US$). Interestingly, the average income of the poorest 10 percent in the most economically free nations is twice the average per-capita income in the least-free nations.
-
Life expectancy is 80.4 years in the top quartile compared to 64.0 years in the bottom quartile.
-
Political and civil liberties and considerably higher in economically free nations than in unfree nations.
Capitalism Needs a Press Agent
Why, then, are young people so anti-capitalist? How can this be? Let’s try these reasons on for size.
1. Ignorance
Current statistics show that recent global progress and the decrease in poverty should be the greatest story of our time. Extreme poverty has been halved, life expectancy has increased, infant mortality has decreased, and deaths from HIV have decreased. Yet over two-thirds of Americans believe none of this has happened. In 2015, the United Nations announced its goal was to eradicate poverty in 15 years. This seems mad, but it can happen if governments keep their grubby hands off private markets.
2. The Myth That Capitalism Is Based on Greed
Conservative economists and philosophers are to blame for this myth. Let’s watch greed turn into progress. What a magic trick! Capitalism is based on self-interest, but entrepreneurs profit only if they serve others. You don’t have to like your fellow human beings--just serve them. If entrepreneurs pursue their personal interests rather than improving service to their customers, their businesses will fail. Because trade is voluntary, both the buyer and the seller must be satisfied with the deal. That’s why both people say “thank you” when the deal is done.
3. The Belief That While Capitalism May Deliver the Goods, It Has No Soul
There is so much more to life than materialism, but money expands lifestyle choices. In fact, billionaires love giving their money away (even though they probably did more good for others while they were earning the money). I’ll grant you that capitalism isn’t romantic and challenge you to write an inspiring folk song about capitalism. However, Deirdre McCloskey makes a strong case that virtue is advanced by capitalism. These virtues include love, faith, humility, courage, prudence, temperance, and justice.
4. The Idea That Planning Is More Efficient Than Markets
F.A. Hayek debunked this one. If you don’t believe it, list all the improvements to our lives by capitalist entrepreneurs against all the improvements to our lives by government programs. Nevertheless, when there is a big problem or a crisis, people turn to government to solve it.
Please Oppress Me
Joan Robinson once said, “The misery of being exploited by capitalism is nothing compared to the misery of not being exploited at all” or as Deirdre McCloskey has been rumored to say at conferences: “The only thing worse than being oppressed by a capitalist is not being oppressed at all.”
If you prefer not to read Smith, Hayek, McCloskey, Friedman, Mises, Bastiat, and Schumpeter, try taking a field trip. The international set can visit North Korea, Cuba (cute old cars), and Venezuela. Those with more limited budgets can visit their local DMV facility, VA hospital, or Social Security office.
As for me, I prefer putting on my “Enjoy Capitalism” t-shirt and having a martini. I will contemplate how billions of human beings, most of whom don’t know each other, had a hand in creating my glass (made in Sweden), gin (made in England), vermouth (made in France), and cocktail shaker (made in China). After the second martini, I won’t care.
I don't know. As a recovering victim of a market fundamentalist economics program, I think that the greatest damage to the image of capitalism has been inflicted by blind ideologues who try and insist, in contradiction of the experiences of most people, that some sort of paleo-capitalism is superior to normal, human-style mixed economies.
It's a neat story, and it sells a lot of books (Just ask Professor Friedman's publishers.), but that dog, as they say, don't hunt.
In other words, the market fundamentalists are no better, and no more right, than Marxists. Extremism is funny that way.
Posted by: Jonas Feit | June 26, 2017 at 08:55 PM
Thanks, Mort, for a provocative post, even though i'm a bit worried that Coca-Cola will be on your case!
Like Jonas, I am unwilling to say that capitalism gets the credit for all the good things that have happened in last two centuries. For one thing, when you break out individual country data, the connection between development indicators and GDP per cap is often non existent, for the simple reason that literacy and public health programs may be funded not out of profits.
Good governance is critical, and bad government a hindrance. Quality varies so greatly across countries and time. The beautiful thing about capitalism is the market enforced accountability in the right circumstances! We should celebrate that! At the same time capitalism is not accountable when the prices are incorrect, as is the case with the environmental damage. No amount of misinterpreting Coase will fix that problem.... I like the approach that capitalism offers us the best shot at freedom to live creative lives of meaning, along with a healthy safety net that we all contribute to. More later....
Posted by: Jonathan B. Wight | June 27, 2017 at 07:02 AM
"Why, then, are young people so anti-capitalist?"
Many young people are anti-capitalism because they don't believe they have any real choices or control over their lives.
Today, our children are forced to compete more and more for fewer and fewer opportunities. In the meantime, just to compete, many of them take on an enormous student debt load that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy should they be unable to find a well-paying job, which is not an unlikely eventuality. Of course, those who cannot otherwise fund their education and do not take on the debt cannot compete and likely will become economic losers who struggle from paycheck to paycheck throughout their lives.
The situation reminds of the lyrics of an old Clash song:
Should I stay or should I go now?
If I go, there will be trouble
And if I stay it will be double
If they go (by leaving the competition), there will be trouble. If they stay, it could be substantially worse, especially if they fail to find a job/career and essentially become indentured servants to the financial industry. Capitalism as a theory claims to be about freedom, but they see capitalism in practice as the opposite.
Posted by: Tao Jonesing | July 17, 2017 at 02:13 PM